Nov 17 City Council moved the Hillcamp road and pump station hearing to Tuesday, November 17. Public comment ran overwhelmingly against both applications, and the Planning Commission approved them 7-0 at 11:30 p.m. on October 13. Write the Council now. How to weigh in →

Documents

Read the file yourself

Each item on this page links to a document you can open. The applications, the technical reports, the letters from agencies, and the plans and laws that govern the decision.

About these links

Each item below links to a document hosted by the City of Lone Tree or another publisher. This site does not rehost documents. All copyright remains with the respective publishers.

City file links move when the City reorganizes its project pages. If one fails, the project page for that application usually has the current version.

New to this? Start with Words the City uses below.

Plain language

Words the City uses

Land use has its own vocabulary. These are the terms this site uses most.

Finding
A written decision the City has to reach on the evidence in front of it before it can approve something. Mentioning a subject in a staff report is not a finding.
Evacuation model
A traffic study of people evacuating instead of commuting. Engineers call the result an evacuation time estimate. It runs the road network in simulation software, loads it with the households who would leave at once, and reports how long clearing them takes. Transportation consultancies do this work under contract. The City can require it as a condition with a defined scope and schedule.
Preliminary plan
The detailed layout the City approves before any lots can be created. It settles the roads, the lot lines and the grading.
Plat, and final plat
The legal map that creates the lots. Once a final plat is recorded, the lots exist and can be sold.
Sub-area plan
The guiding plan for one piece of a larger master-planned development.
Referral
When the City sends an application out to other agencies, such as the fire district, the water district, Colorado Parks and Wildlife, the state geologist, CDOT and the County, and asks each for written comments. Those comments are advice. The City decides what to do with them.
Will-serve letter
A letter from a water district saying it expects to be able to serve a development. State law lists six things such a letter has to contain. It is evidence the City may weigh, and it sets no water aside.
Level of service, or LOS
A report-card grade traffic engineers give an intersection or a single turn, from A down to F. F means long waits and queues that do not clear.
Factor of safety
How much stronger a slope is than the bare minimum needed to stay in place. A factor of 1.0 sits exactly at the edge of failing. Engineers generally want 1.5 for permanent slopes carrying homes and roads.
Big game pinch point
A place Colorado Parks and Wildlife maps where animal movement is squeezed into a narrow path. Building on one cuts a route that has no easy replacement.
No Surface Occupancy
Colorado Parks and Wildlife’s recommendation against building on a particular piece of ground.
Quasi-judicial
A decision a council or commission has to make on the evidence presented at the hearing, with an open mind, and not on private conversations or outside research.
Executive session
A closed portion of a public meeting. Colorado law allows them for specific purposes, including giving instructions to negotiators. No formal action or decision may be taken in one.
Development agreement
A contract between a city and a developer setting out who builds and pays for what. It is negotiated rather than decided at a public hearing.
Vested rights
The right to keep building under the rules that applied when a project was approved, even after the rules change. Under C.R.S. § 24-68-103 they attach only once the City approves a site-specific development plan.
Defensible space
The cleared and managed ground around a building that gives it a chance in a wildfire.
CORA
The Colorado Open Records Act. It lets any member of the public ask a government body for its records.
Acre-foot
Enough water to cover an acre one foot deep, about 326,000 gallons. Roughly a year’s supply for two or three Front Range households.

Section A

The four applications

Each one is a separate file with its own case number. Together they would plan, divide and build out this part of the bluffs. The developer is not asking for a rezoning.

The four pending Hillcamp applications, with case numbers, scope and City project pages
Case numberApplicationScopeLink
RG24-0007 Hillcamp Sub-Area Plan The guiding plan and design rules for the whole site City project page, Sub-Area Plan
SB25-0010 RidgeGate Rural Residential Preliminary Plan 261 single-family lots, about 221 acres, 45 tracts City project page, RidgeGate Rural Residential Preliminary Plan
SB25-0009 Southridge Preserve Preliminary Plan, Parcels 4 and 5 82 single-family lots, about 171 acres, 22 tracts, amenity center City project page, Southridge Preserve Preliminary Plan
SB25-0014 Final Plat, Hillcamp Trail Filing No. 1 The public street, including the Cabela Drive extension, retaining walls, and the bridge over the East/West Regional Trail City project page, Hillcamp Trail Final Plat

The City decides each application separately. A comment on one is not automatically part of the file on the others, so file on each application your comment touches. Each project page has its own comment form.

The full list of pending City applications, including these four, is published at cityoflonetree.com/projects/.

Latest

Planning Commission hearing packet, October 2026

This is the latest submittal on the road (SB25-0014), posted for the October 13 hearing. It includes the September 4 ground study, the State geologist’s August 20 letter, staff’s August 21 review letter and a new maintenance plan. The houses are not part of it.

Documents in the October 2026 Planning Commission hearing packet for SB25-0014
DocumentLink
Final plat, Hillcamp Trail Filing No. 1PDF, Final plat, Hillcamp Trail Filing No. 1
Ground study and slope stability analysis, September 4, 2026PDF, Ground study and slope stability analysis, September 4, 2026
Third party ground reviews, State geologist letters and responsesPDF, Third party ground reviews, State geologist letters and responses
City staff review letters and responsesPDF, City staff review letters and responses
Maintenance plan, September 2026PDF, Maintenance plan, September 2026
Memo on roadway alignment, the seven routes consideredPDF, Memo on roadway alignment, the seven routes considered
Agency comments, second referralPDF, Agency comments, second referral
Applicant responses, second referralPDF, Applicant responses, second referral
Wildfire risk assessmentPDF, Wildfire risk assessment
Drainage reportPDF, Drainage report
Traffic impact studyPDF, Traffic impact study
Biological assessmentPDF, Biological assessment
Civil construction plansPDF, Civil construction plans
Public comments, second referralPDF, Public comments, second referral

All documents are on the City’s project page for the road.

Section B

Resubmittal 2, March 2026

The developer filed a revised packet on March 27, 2026, answering the first round of agency comments. It is still the current filing for the Sub-Area Plan and both preliminary plans.

Documents filed with the second resubmittal, March 2026
DocumentLink
Sub-Area PlanPDF, Sub-Area Plan
Sub-Area Plan, City response letterPDF, Sub-Area Plan, City response letter
RidgeGate RR, Preliminary PlanPDF, RidgeGate RR, Preliminary Plan
RidgeGate RR, project narrativePDF, RidgeGate RR, project narrative
RidgeGate RR, traffic impact studyPDF, RidgeGate RR, traffic impact study
RidgeGate RR, drainage reportPDF, RidgeGate RR, drainage report
RidgeGate RR, geotechnical investigationPDF, RidgeGate RR, geotechnical investigation
RidgeGate RR, wildfire mitigation planPDF, RidgeGate RR, wildfire mitigation plan
RidgeGate RR, wildlife preservation planPDF, RidgeGate RR, wildlife preservation plan
Southridge, Preliminary PlanPDF, Southridge, Preliminary Plan
Southridge, project narrativePDF, Southridge, project narrative
Southridge, traffic impact studyPDF, Southridge, traffic impact study
Southridge, geotechnical investigationPDF, Southridge, geotechnical investigation
Southridge, wildfire mitigation planPDF, Southridge, wildfire mitigation plan
Southridge, wildlife preservation planPDF, Southridge, wildlife preservation plan
Hillcamp Trail, final platPDF, Hillcamp Trail, final plat
Hillcamp Trail, construction documentsPDF, Hillcamp Trail, construction documents
Hillcamp Trail, geotechnical and slope stabilityPDF, Hillcamp Trail, geotechnical and slope stability
Hillcamp Trail, Phase III drainage reportPDF, Hillcamp Trail, Phase III drainage report

Section C

First round of comments, December 2025

This is the original submittal. Compare it against the March 2026 revised packet to see what the developer changed after the agencies commented.

Documents from the first round of comments, December 2025
DocumentLink
Sub-Area PlanPDF, Sub-Area Plan
Project narrativePDF, Project narrative
Traffic impact studyPDF, Traffic impact study

Section D

Community filings

Two collections are worth reading in full.

Documents filed by residents and neighborhood groups
DocumentWhat it isLink
Save the Lone Tree Bluffs document library A shared archive of application material, correspondence and supporting research assembled by residents Dropbox library

Section E

Plans, codes and laws that govern this decision

The City measures a preliminary plan, the detailed layout it approves before lots can be platted, against the standards below.

Plans, codes and statutes governing the Hillcamp applications
ReferenceWhat it does
Lone Tree Code § 17-3-20 The standards for approving a preliminary plan. The City has to find the plan matches the Comprehensive Plan, the Zoning Code and the sub-area plan that applies, and meets the City’s own Roadway Design and Construction Standards.
Lone Tree Code § 17-3-40 Process. The Planning Commission recommends, and City Council decides.
Lone Tree Code Ch. 16, Art. XV Planned Development District. This is the zoning rulebook the City used to set up the RidgeGate planning areas.
Lone Tree Elevated: Shaping the Future 2045 The Comprehensive Plan, adopted February 2025 and amended December 2025. Consistency with it is a condition of approval.
RidgeGate PD District, 7th Amendment The zoning plan for this area. It caps the Rural Residential Planning Area at 261 homes and requires a sub-area plan that establishes the integrity of the bluffs.
2025 Lone Tree Community Wildfire Protection Plan Adopted 2025. The City’s own assessment of wildfire hazard, fuels and evacuation constraints.
International Fire Code Appendix D § D107 Sets two fire-apparatus access roads as the default above 30 dwelling units, with an exception for fully sprinklered dwellings. Lone Tree adopted the 2018 International Fire Code with Appendices B, C and D, by an amendment to Chapter 18 heard November 20, 2018. Appendix D is in force here.
Colorado Wildfire Resiliency Code Adopted under SB 23-166 and effective in Lone Tree July 1, 2026. It covers defensible space, roofing, vents, decking and exterior materials. It does not reach road width or a way out, so we do not read compliance with it as answering the one-road objection.
C.R.S. § 29-20-303 and § 29-20-304 Require a finding that the water supply is adequate before approval.
C.R.S. §§ 31-23-225, 31-23-226 Requires a municipality to notify the state geologist before approving a subdivision covering five or more acres. Geologic hazard review by the Colorado Geological Survey is advisory and non-binding.
C.R.S. § 24-67-105 The state Planned Unit Development Act. It tells a local government to set density and intensity standards for planned developments by ordinance. It does not itself require a capacity finding on any one application.
C.R.S. §§ 43-2-109, 43-2-111 County authority over county road systems.
C.R.S. § 24-68-103 Statutory vested rights to build under the old rules attach only once the City approves a site-specific development plan. No approval has been granted here, so this section does not vest anything yet. Colorado also recognizes vested rights at common law, which this section does not cover.

The Lone Tree Municipal Code, including the sections cited above, is published in full at library.municode.com.

CDOT sources for the I-25 figures

The I-25 numbers we cite on the case come from these two CDOT sources.

CDOT sources for the I-25 corridor figures cited on this site
SourceWhat it supports
CDOT Highways: Traffic Counts CDOT’s published count data. Source of the daily volume and the share of rated capacity we give for I-25 between Happy Canyon Road and Castle Pines Parkway, and of the counts for CO 86 and US 85.
I-25 Planning and Environmental Linkages Study The CDOT and FHWA study of this stretch of I-25. Source of the passage we quote on limited alternate routes and on drivers diverting onto local roads. This copy is hosted by the City of Castle Pines. We have not confirmed a publication year, so we cite it without one.

The closure count we give on the case page was compiled from CDOT closure announcements and news reports over January 2025 to September 2026. We have not found a single published tally, so treat it as our count rather than CDOT’s.

Section F

News coverage

We link the one story whose address we have verified. The others are cited by name and date only.

News coverage of the Hillcamp proposal
PublicationDateStory
CBS Colorado November 7, 2025 “Lone Tree neighbors in Colorado’s Douglas County worry about proposal for Hillcamp development”
Colorado Politics December 4, 2025 Cited by name and date only. URL not verified
Castle Pines Connection March 1, 2026 Cited by name and date only. URL not verified
Denver Gazette June 8, 2026 Cited by name and date only. URL not verified

Our sources and credits page gives full sourcing for the photographs, documents and quotations used across this site.

Write your letter